- Bennett exudes confidence in a ‘giant’ election victory, Lapid is only slightly more circumspect, as they announce an alliance that makes sense for them both and kicks off a crucial campaign
Launching their “Together” election alliance on Sunday night, Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid unsurprisingly both highlighted the key shared positions that Bennett asserted will guarantee them a “giant victory” over Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in general elections scheduled for October.
Bennett, in his opening remarks, vowed to establish a state commission of inquiry into the failures surrounding the Hamas invasion and massacre of October 7, 2023 — the powerhouse independent probe rejected by Netanyahu and supported by 60 percent or more of the Israeli public.
He promised to pass legislation requiring military service for all, and thus to reduce the burden on Israel’s exhausted reservists — in sharp contrast to the Netanyahu government’s unconscionable, undemocratic and hugely unpopular exemption from the draft of most ultra-Orthodox young men.
Lapid, in his prepared statement, also vowed to draft the Haredim, and to tackle soaring crime, bring down the cost of living, and reform the education system. Importantly, he declared: “We stand here together for everyone who believes in democracy. Who believes in the deep Jewish foundation of this state. Who believes in the values of Zionism and in our right to this land.”
What was less predictable, however, was the ease and assurance with which they acknowledged their different positions on the political spectrum.
They’ve overcome those differences before, of course, when they built a wildly diverse coalition after the 2021 elections, under which first Bennett and then Lapid served as prime minister.
But that was a post-election partnership that represented the only means by which either, indeed both, could attain the leadership of Israel — albeit briefly, as it turned out. Sunday night’s alliance is a pre-election choice, and the old-new partners made a virtue of their dissimilarities.
Bennett readily acknowledged that he and Lapid “have different views,” and declared himself a man of the right — a “right-wing, liberal Zionist” as he put it. Lapid spoke for his centrist constituency, explaining that “to win the elections, the entire center must unite behind Bennett.” And both argued that the overwhelming majority of Israelis, more than just about anything else, are seeking unity and common purpose from their leadership, after years of internal division.
The merger of Bennett’s barely formed “Bennett 2026” party with Lapid’s well-established Yesh Atid makes clear sense for Bennett, who will be the leader of “Together” and thus likely the undisputed head of the anti-Netanyahu bloc going into the elections.
It marks more of a concession by Lapid, since there will be no rotating the prime ministership in the event of a win this time. Lapid indicated he might not even be No.2 on their joint slate if fellow opposition party leader Gadi Eisenkot comes aboard. (“Whatever it takes” to win the elections, said Lapid.) But Yesh Atid has been sagging heavily in the polls, and might have been at risk of falling below the electoral threshold altogether.
Bennett projected absolute conviction that victory is imminent and responded to questions about how he could draw votes from the Netanyahu camp, and muster a Zionist majority without relying on Arab parties, by asking one reporter how Netanyahu could possibly achieve the latter feat. The incumbent leads a bloc that only has enough support for “35 Zionist seats” in the 120-member Knesset, said Bennett.
Bennett also promised “surprises ahead” — presumably in the shape of further alliances and compelling new candidates.
But Netanyahu, the greatest Israeli political campaigner of his generation, will have known that this merger was on the cards, and is doubtless preparing surprises of his own. Bennett and Lapid may have ousted him in the summer of 2021, but within 18 months, Netanyahu had gradually persuaded most MKs in Bennett’s own party to abandon their leader. And it was Netanyahu who won the November 2022 elections and is currently on course to hold his right, far-right, ultra-Orthodox coalition together for a full, four-year term.
Asked about the dangers of Netanyahu managing to prise defectors from Bennett’s next set of MKs, Lapid replied lightly that Bennett, as a smart man, has doubtless learned the lessons. And he brushed aside concerns that Bennett himself might betray him and join forces with Netanyahu.
Bennett described their merger as a “daring” move, and asserted that “Who dares wins.” “The people of Israel are thinking big,” he said, dismissing reporters’ questions about a seat here or there potentially making all the difference on election day. “They want a big change.”
Lapid, only a little more circumspect, told a watching nation — much of their press conference was televised — that the alliance guarantees “a government without Netanyahu,” in an election that he said was not so much “fateful” for Israel as “existential.”
The pro-Netanyahu Channel 14 had cut away by that point, and soon after was touting its latest survey findings, which claimed to show that the Netanyahu-led bloc is heading for another Knesset majority, with 64 seats — a striking 13-14 more than other surveys have been finding in recent weeks — with Netanyahu’s own Likud on 34 seats, compared to a pitiful 20 for the new Bennett-Lapid “Together” alliance.
But even Channel 14 had broadcast the first 10 minutes of the presser, up to and including the final sentence of Lapid’s prepared remarks to the Israeli public. “You’re going to now hear 1,000 commentaries [on this alliance],” said the man who has now put aside any realistic prospect of again being prime minister himself. “But remember one thing: This thing that you’re feeling right now, that you haven’t felt for a long time, is called hope.”
BY: Writer David Horovitz is the founding editor of The Times of Israel
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect The Times Union‘ point of view
